Monday, July 11, 2005
Richmond Raft
Also:
Chop Suey - excellent used bookshop, great artbook selection.
Black Swan Books - another excellent used bookshop.
The Byrd Theatre - a 1928 movie PALACE. It's beautiful! Movies are only $1.99!!
The Virginia Museum of Fine Arts - It's free!!
Anderson Gallery's current exhibition - Relativity. Blogged here and here with more to come.
Hollywood Cemetery - an old cemetery, spooky!
Kuba Kuba - Great food!! Cheap!!!
Edo Squid - more great food!! Noisy.
Richmonders - what else can we recommend?
Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala (Literary Week!): Larry Woiwode

Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala (Literary Week!): Larry Woiwode, originally uploaded by Bromirski.
This is Larry Woiwode.
I chose a poem from his collection Even Tide and asked Larry if he'd write it on my painting. In this picture you can see Larry holding the book and transcribing the poem. He changed it a little bit from book to painting; the original poem was written about twenty-five years before the transcription. I'm very thankful to Larry Woiwode. Below is the poem taken from the book, tomorrow I'll post an update showing how it was edited for the painting.
I stared the stars in the face for an answer
And the moon appeared – it was no apparition,
The gold round host
In a cold sky.
It spoke:
Dark is nearer my heart than light;
I arrived, as you, out of equal circumstance,
And I, as you, reveal myself at night.
You see death has taken my face
And ages before the rest but my eye
Looking down wondering why you tremble
When you contend only with her or a her and I
With the irresuscitability of myself,
Myself, myself, and this – ambiguous sky.
BONUS!: this is the same painting Jonathan Franzen posed with earlier. Here's the finished painting.
UPDATE 7/11/2005: the last line is the only thing different on my painting, he omitted the word "ambiguous".
Sunday, July 10, 2005
Saturday, July 09, 2005
Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala (Literary Week!): Sherod Santos

Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala (Literary Week!): Sherod Santos, originally uploaded by Bromirski.
This is Sherod Santos.
Here's an interview with Sherod Santos.
Thumbs-Up Magic, Activate!
Friday, July 08, 2005
OPTIONS 2005 Artists Announced
Bayo Abiodun
Judy Baumann
Jorge Benitez
Anne Benolken
Sheila Blake
Chad Caldwell
Kimberly Caputo
Tim DeVoe
Suzanna Fields
Lynn Galuzzo
Emily Hall
Lori Larusso
Ryan Mulligan
Mark Robarge
Lindsay Rogers
Amanda Sauer
Gary Thompson
George Tkbladze
Randy Toy
Susan Vaughan
Thanks to Lenny for the news.
Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala (Literary Week!): Jonathan Franzen
Thursday, July 07, 2005
Jules Jones
I have two Jules Jones works, one small one and one big one. The small one is one of the exhibition announcements he posted last year, they were all original works of art themselves (I didn't take it from the bulletin board until after the show was over). I lucked out getting the big one too. Theresa Pfarr gave me a bunch of big stretchers she didn't want anymore and I passed some of them on to Jules and Michael Ellyson and some others. Jules stretched some canvas and made one of his biggest paintings, and one of his few works-on-canvas, and then gave the painting back to me. I think it was just too big for his small space and he is used to working on paper and rolling them up after. He couldn't deal with this big painting of his in his face all day. Thanks Jules!!!
Jules is moving to Austin TX soon to pursue an MFA, Theresa has a residency at Roswell, Mike is going somewhere too. Remember their names, they are all very good.
Wednesday, July 06, 2005
Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala (Literary Week!): Carl Dennis

Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala (Literary Week!): Carl Dennis, originally uploaded by Bromirski.
This is Carl Dennis. He won the 2002 Pulitzer Prize for poetry for his collection Practical Gods.
Tuesday, July 05, 2005
Eric Deis
Daniel Buren, Inside (Centre of Guggenheim), 1971
Daniel Buren, Inside (Centre of Guggenheim), 1971. Installed for one day.
I came across this color reproduction of Buren's 1971 Guggenheim piece over the weekend. This title is different - I thought it was called Peinture-Sculpture. Maybe one title is for the piece and the other for the exhibition, like with the latest exhibition The Eye of the Storm and the big centerpiece Around the Corner? Doesn't he have another title for the gel-covered windows at the top, something like The Rose Window? Isn't it all one piece? Why the different titles?
Here's Daniel Baird's Brooklyn Rail article on Buren's 2005 Guggenheim installation.
I blogged the Daniel Buren lecture, part one here and part two here.
Whitney Biennial 2006 - Last Chance!!!
12/6 - Friendsters - this is my original post with Whitney Biennial submission information and suggesting artists from all over submit their work to the Whitney's Biennial Coordinator.
1/16 - Whitney Biennial - the curators are announced!
1/27 - Artnet posts the Whitney Biennial submission information (!!!)
1/28 - Whitney Biennial II!
2/5 - Whitney Museum Seeks Biennial Coordinator - the Whitney announces it is searching for a Biennial Coordinator!
2/15 - The Whitney Is Shunning Me! - nobody will answer my questions!!
3/14 - The Face of the Lady who is Shunning me! - this is the head of the people that won't answer my questions!!
5/12 - Whitney Biennial 2006 Update - the Whitney updates the submission information on their website.
Okay, I think those are all my main posts on this. I wonder how many people reading all of those posts have actually sent in a submission? What if someone actually gets in?? I hope so, that would be great.
Submissions:
All submissions to be considered for exhibition in the Biennial should include the artist's biography or resume, a brief description of the proposed work, and between six and eight images. Recommended formats for images include slides, computer printouts, digital images on a CD_ROM, audio CDs, or VHS videotapes. We do not accept original artworks in the submission package.
Submissions may be sent to:
Biennial Coordinator
Whitney Museum of American Art
945 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10021
Good Luck!!!
Monday, July 04, 2005
One Day In The Garden, page 11
Friday, July 01, 2005
Relativity II - James Davis and Jeannine Harkleroad

Relativity - Jeannine Harkleroad, originally uploaded by Bromirski
James Davis - James Davis is the artist whose pieces are pictured here behind the Jules Olitski pedestals. He's got three pieces in the show, two of which are very similar and one that is much more interesting. The two pieces that are both sort of dead on the wall utilize that accumulative process that is currently such a popular sculptural trope. One is a mandala on canvas of a million little colored glue balls and the other is a mandala of a million colored-pencil concentric rings. His third piece is created through a process of both accumulation and removal, it's a big rectangle of mdf board through which he's drilled(?) a number - less than a million - of various sized small holes. The brownish mdf board against the blue wall looks great and the board is hung not directly against the wall but on hooks or something so it floats a couple inches off the wall - you can peek in at the side and all of the little circles of overlapping shadow and light in that narrow space is like blasting off to warp-speed.
I think he has a show coming up at RARE?
Jeannine Harkleroad - Jeannine's is the sculptural installation piece pictured in the yellow room above. This piece is actually the set from a performance she did at the opening. I missed the performance but I've heard about it and seen some photos. There was a person in a chicken mascot suit with a football at one end and a goal post and traffic light at the far end. Jeanine and another person were laying down inside those little houses at the top of the ramps and at the signal they sped down and crashed into one another. I'm not sure what the performance means exactly other than that she set it up so she was doomed to fail with the little house she was in crashing into the larger house, neither reaching the goal post.
I don't have any good pictures of specific works, just installation shots, so if the artists or anyone else want to send some jpgs I'll post them.
Thursday, June 30, 2005
Relativity
Someone was kind enough to send me some photos of Relativity, the Anderson Gallery's current exhibition, featuring the work of four local artists (Jeannine Harkleroad, Chris Norris, Sun Tek Chung, James Davis) each paired with that of artists from the gallery's collection.
The galleries look good, as good as I've seen yet, but some aspects of the installation really bother me. The artwork of the four locals (all of whom work for VCU) is well-presented but that of artist's from the gallery's collection is mostly annoying and frustrating.
The picture above is of the work of James Davis paired with that of Jules Olitski. The three pieces on the wall belong to Davis; Olitski's prints are on the pedestals. Those pedestals are at least five feet high and covered with plexiglass. I'm six feet tall and except for the edges all I could see was glare. ANNOYING! I'm pretty sure that is not the way the artist intended for them to be presented. Here is what they supposedly look like, but although I've seen them for real I can't confirm that. Hey George, sometimes it is better to see things on the web!
There was a funny(?) moment at the opening when I was on the periphery of a circle admiring Davis' work (including the artist and Dean Richard Toscan) and Elizabeth King was introducing Davis and his work to a couple. She made a sweeping gesture with her arm saying something like "James did all these" which ended with her hand on the Olitski pedestals. I said those were by Jules Olitski and she looked a bit confused. I forget what we said next exactly but I did tell Toscan that I know Olitski's daughter. I was on his left and he continued to look straight ahead and sort of ignore me. Toscan looks like David Paymer to me, whenever I see him I think it's the mob guy from ABC's Line of Fire (it was set in Richmond!).
Almost as bad as the presentation of the Olitskis was the presentation of a photograph by Thomas Daniel, the artist whose work is juxtaposed with that of Sun Tek Chung. I say almost as bad because if you get on your knees and tilt your head to the side you are able to check out Daniel's photograph, whereas with the Olitskis you don't have a chance. Here it is.
At the recommendation of a more sensible artist friend I contacted the curator, Amy Hauft, for more insight into some of her presentation decisions and she wrote back explaining some of her ideas:
"In all cases with the works from the Anderson collection, I wanted to take them away from being exclusively images and force them into being "things". I did this with the Olitskis by presenting them on edge at eye level atop pedestals of their exact dimension. As mentioned in the handout, I wanted to highlight the iridescent ink that was more visually pronounced at that angle. In some ways, you could say that I was treating them the way that James Davis treats his materials. He maximizes what they are materially and then uses that materiality to create his imagery. As for the Daniel photo on the floor... certainly taking the image off the wall and leaning it against the wall turns it into more of an object. I am a sculptor and I always find power in object-ness. Because a thing is in the room with us, it is less ignorable, more undeniable. Part of it was a sense of numbers - that there were/are so many of them (the daughters)...they are waiting in the wings. Part of it is to indicate that its a working project, metaphorically rearrangeable to create other relationships."
I'm glad she wrote back and I get what she was trying to do, but I think the project fails. First of all, they were never "exclusively" images and have always been things; they don't need to be forced. The Olitski pieces now are not only no longer images but irrelevant. The "things" that James Davis' work is relating to are three five-foot-high reflective pedestals.
I'm also extremely disconcerted at the amount of curatorial liscence taken with the work. Why does the art serve the curator and not the curator serve the art? Amy Hauft is an artist herself and the creator of a fantastic installation at the Beaver College Art Gallery a few years ago but suppose a future curator were to reinstall her piece at ankle-level in a pitch-black room, or on a wall, and present it as a Hauft? What is a curator's responsibility to an artist's intention?
I'll post more about the individual artists later, I had to post about the presentation first.
RELATED: Hans Dieter Huber Artists as Curators - Curators as Artists?
Tuesday, June 28, 2005
EnvironMental
Sun Tek is also currently featured in Relativity at the Anderson Gallery.
Opening reception Wednesday, June 29th, 7 to 9pm.
One Day In The Garden, page 10
Monday, June 27, 2005
Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala: William Bailey
This is William Bailey. Here's a recent Brooklyn Rail article on William Bailey.
Thumbs-Up Mandala dieties featured to date:
Peter Halley
Lois Dodd
Nayland Blake
Pat Adams
Ray Kass
Wolf Kahn
Kai Vierstra
Inka Essenhigh
Sunday, June 26, 2005
Katharina Grosse at Solvent Space
Friday, June 24, 2005
LA BIENNALE DI VENEZIA BLOG 2005 is ready!!!!
I met Nally in NYC and she took this photo of me with my good buddy Julian Schnabel. Look in the background and you can see Jeff Koons trying to get a picture too.
He did it!!!
Thursday, June 23, 2005
One Day In The Garden, page 9
(click on the page numbers above to see enlarged images of previous pages)
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala: Inka Essenhigh
This is Inka Essenhigh. Here's the Chuck Close version.
Inka gave a lecture at the VMFA last year and one piece of advice she had still sticks in my mind, especially when considering her own work. Talking about her abrupt switch from enamels to oil she said she did it because she knew that she wanted to eventually start painting in oil and decided there was no reason to put it off; she should just switch immediately. I’m not sure if I’m wording this very well but the gist of the advice was that if you can see yourself doing something differently in five or ten years you should make that change now.
Today on Franklin Einspruch's Artblog they are discussing Richard Serra's work; frequent commenter oldpro states "like Kelley and Johns and so many of our current art culture heros his {Serra's} virtue is to have evolved a "signature" style and stuck with it, unaffected by the changes inspiration always forces on art, for decades. It really is soulless stuff... ". I'm pretty sure that oldpro is not an Essenhigh fan but going by his definition above I don't think he could call her work soulless.
All of the following are recent Inka Essenhigh paintings: Ice Cliff(2005), Bullies(2005), Brush with Death(2004). This newer work has so much more emotional depth than the earlier stuff - much richer. Haircut(2005) is so sweet, almost like a Norman Rockwell. The earlier work had an art-nouveau futuristic feel but much of the latest stuff seems to be looking back to American art of the 30’s and earlier. I’m thinking of some members of the Ashcan School like George Bellows, Everett Shinn, and especially the under-known William Glackens (click on the title of an image and then click on the thumbnail to enlarge), and also Ryder and Rockwell; I wonder how much she and husband Steve Mumford influence each other and share sources.
RELATED: The VMFA recently acquired a 2002 Essenhigh, Green Wave, which Jennifer Reeves describes thusly at the end of this short essay on Essenhigh's work.
"One gigantic eyeball hovers among huge waves, in a recent painting, wherein a figure attempts to rise at the shoreline. This eyeball clues us in to the powerful undercurrents of imagination ready to be harvested from our very souls. Refusing to be beached along the shores of the unconscious, Essenhigh plunges headlong into its ocean of mysteries. May we take on the high waves with her, navigating between the dangerous undertows, devoutly awash in the grace of blue greens."
P.S. I had a great studio visit with her; she really narrowed in on some things, very sensitive and helpful.
Monday, June 20, 2005
Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala: Kai Vierstra

Sunday, June 19, 2005
Saturday, June 18, 2005
Relativity
One of the things to love is the bright orange room of over-the-top Chris Norris drawing/paintings. Something to really hate is the presentation of the works from the collection. I thought the curatorial connections might bother me but I wasn't prepared for how badly some of the the older work would be displayed.
I'll go into more detail in a future post.
UPDATE 6/20/2005: At the recommendation of an artist friend I contacted the curator, Amy Hauft, for more insight into some of the presentation decisions. I'll share her ideas in the next Relativity post.
RELATED: Chris Norris is also one of the members of Feast, currently showing at 1708 Gallery. I've added a little to my original post on this show. Go see it before it closes on June 25th. Feast is very good.
P.S. - Hello Richmonders! More of you are reading this since that Style Weekly article came out and I'd like to encourage you to leave comments on local shows and art things. Comments can be left anonymously, you don't need to feel shy. This blog is read by people across the country (mostly in NY, VA, and CA) and is an opportunity to give some local names more national exposure. I'm sorry it has been so much about myself lately but I've been a little busy. You are welcome and encouraged to leave comments on a show/artist not covered in the post.
Friday, June 17, 2005
One Day In The Garden, page 5
drawn by the scent of death, a fly came upon a murdered caterpillar.
A cry of alarm rang throughout the garden.
(click on the text to see enlarged images)
Carol Vogel and Sarah Milroy Come Out for Marlene Dumas!
Carol Vogel has come out in support of Marlene Dumas! In her NYTimes Venice Biennial overview she remarks that the Italian pavilion "is showing masters like Francis Bacon, Agnes Martin, Marlene Dumas and Philip Guston alongside younger artists."
And in today's Globe & Mail Biennial coverage Sarah Milroy writes "and the canvases of Marlene Dumas marked her as the best of the living painters on show".
ANTI-DUMAS:
Charlie Finch,Tyler Green, Richard Polsky, Jerry Saltz
PRO-DUMAS:
Nicole Davis, Nicole Eisenmann, Joy Garnett, Cynthia King, Sarah Milroy, Adrian Searle, Richard Vine, Carol Vogel
It is worth noting that of the pro-Dumas people more than half are women; all of the anti-Dumasers are men. Maybe there is something to a previous commenter's accusations of sexism after all. Also notable is that half of the pros are artists and there are no artists among the antis.
The anti-Marlene Dumas dudes are starting to look more and more like an Artnet circle-jerk. At least Saltz has been consistent, his dislike goes all the way back to 1993 and is actually stated in an article on painting, not a throw-away line in an article on the market like the evaluations of the other three.
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
1708 Gallery Seeks New Director
Peter is also an artist - he's got some nice woodblock prints in the ADA Gallery 12 by12 racks.
FEAST... Against the World

feast, originally uploaded by Bromirski.
Went to 1708 Gallery to see the FEAST show today. Feast (I'm not sure if it needs to be capitalized or not) is a six-member artist collective consisting of Terral Bolton, Terry Brown, Sherry Griffin, C.J. Hawn, Stephanie Lundy, and Chris Norris. Most of the work in this show is photography - but consider Feast a campy conceptual performance group. They use themselves and others as models in the photographs.
FEAST... Against the World closes June 25th.
RELATED - 1708 Gallery is looking for a new director.
Tuesday, June 14, 2005
Monday, June 13, 2005
Art For The Cash Poor White Hot Market Report
Stuffy's is Neverending
Friday, June 10, 2005
Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala: Wolf Kahn
This is Wolf Kahn.
Wolf Kahn is cool. He immediately agreed to pose for a thumbs-up photo but then turned and faced the wall. I asked him to pose for another one in which I could see his face and he pointed to a sparkly paint puddle on the floor (beneath a work-in-progress) and gave it a big thumbs-up. Wolf Kahn has a huge following but he's still underrated.
When I was at the Vermont Studio Center in 1999 we were eating lunch when Louise Von Weise, a co-founder, noticed that some ducklings were being swept downstream away from their mother and so she had me and Jon Gregg jump into the river to save them. Wolf Kahn wasted no time stripping down to his underwear and jumping in too. He didn't catch a duckling, but he tried. That was fun.
I have a confession to make. I did it with Wolf Kahn!
(someone just told me his paintings are queer and he looks like an old woman, but I'm having none of it. Why do these non-art people hang around me when I'm blogging?? Go away! He's great!)
Thursday, June 09, 2005
Stuffy's is Over
Scope Hamptons???
Artists continue to voice opinions on the work of Marlene Dumas on the Jerry Saltz still doesn't like Marlene Dumas post. Seth, the latest commenter, has provided a partial listing of who he thinks are the "vital female painters working today" - one of whom, Ati Maier, I was unfamiliar with. Thanks for your list Seth.
*Speaking of art fairs, I can't believe there is a Scope Hamptons! That's sick! How sad.
Wednesday, June 08, 2005
Michael Jackson

Ryan Mulligan, Kate Hudnall, and Tim Devoe in Style Weekly
Here's the link. This week's issue also has a review of David Freed's show at Reynolds Gallery.
Tuesday, June 07, 2005
David Cerny
Artist Hans Heiner Buhr pointed this out in the previous post's comments. have you visited his blog yet? He's in Georgia.
Walter Robinson

Walter Robinson
I borrowed an art book called post-hypnotic from the library and only after I had checked it out did I discover that Tom Moody wrote one of it's two essays (the book's main author and curator of the exhibition is Barry Blinderman). Later I was looking at the cool painting pictured above and was so surprised to see that it was created by Artnet editor Walter Robinson! Nice!
It's one of two spin-art paintings he has featured in the book, both very different. He mentions them in the last paragraph of this artnet post in relation to the sale of some of Damien Hirst's worse spin paintings to MoMA. You can see a third example in this 1997(!) artnet review of a Hirst show. Robinson is also known for his body of pulp fiction cover like work, which bring to mind Richard Prince's nurse paintings. I like Robinson's spin paintings much more than Hirst's... and the roulette wheel and and dizzy(?) drunk of this piece relate interestingly to the spin stuff.
You probably think I'm making this huge suck-up move to Walter Robinson, which I partly am, but I'll sabotage it by sharing that Robinson thinks I'm a moron. He sent me this in an e-mail a while back -
"thanks for the stab in the back -- I'll try to remember it in the future... tell your readers for me that I think you're a moron"
So there you have it, Walter Robinson thinks I'm a moron and wants me to share that with you. That sucks. The funny thing is that the moron e-mail was preceded by an e-mail only the day before which included -
"been meaning to contact you about your great post -- you know your stuff."
What does that mean though where he says "I'll try to remember it in the future"? I'm going to get panned on artnet or something? No more Richmond reviews on artnet?
That's hilarious.
UPDATE from The FUTURE: Okay, it is 10/2007, and I did not get into Geisai Miami, of which Walter was one of the judges. Touche, Walter!
UPDATE from The FUTURE II: It is now 1/2008.... hahahahahahaha.
Monday, June 06, 2005
more thoughts on Dumas, Saltz, the art market, etc.
George made a good observation in the comments section of a recent Modern Kicks post on Saltz’s article - “Saltz complains about speculation at the auctions, but participates in promoting the speculation at the entry level”. YES. Another interesting thing about that post for me was JL’s remark that “the shakeout he (Saltz) longs for sounds like it would cost me my job. Let the eagle soar, I say”. It made me realize again that there are so many people working in the art industry dependent on its continued growth and expansion, maybe not always in the best interests of art? Are artists the only art industry people that don’t have salaries and insurance? Why are we on the bottom of the pile? Wouldn’t it be nice if we had job security to worry about?
Aren't you artists that don't live in NY sick of hearing about this fantastic market in which shows sell out before they open and everyone has a waiting list? They keep saying "the art market" like it is the same all over, but is that what's happening in Chicago, Boston, Philly and wherever else? Seriously, I don't know, so please tell me. It isn't happening in Richmond, that's for sure. Am I the only one that doesn't sell?
I doubt it. Spector Gallery is one of Philadelphia's *hot* galleries and Jim Houser is her hot artist but look at how low most of his prices are! I'm not saying I love his work or anything but I'm surprised that a hot artist in a hot gallery in a big city is so affordable what with all of this stuff we always here about the out-of-control market. I was similarly surprised last year when Sarah McEneaney, a Philadelphia artist whose work I do love and who gets great reviews, showed at Reynolds Gallery. Her prices were lower than I would have expected also.
Friday, June 03, 2005
Futamigaura
Here's the painting from the earlier Ray Kass post, one of my Futamigaura paintings. It's gloomy, but that rock is magical.
Art For The Cash Poor 6
Getting excited about the BIG JUNE ART FAIR, Philadelphia's Art for the Cash Poor. I'm going to (try to) sell meatballs and take orders for Social Sculpture, Packets of Rejection, Subscriptions to Rejection, and Thumbs-Up Photos. Here are some photos of a previous Art for the Cash Poor event.
*Free Art Alert* - printout yourself and show up with your favorite piece of Social Sculpture and I'll sign it for you. A savings of $2.00!!
COME!!!
June 15th
June 15th is also the deadline to submit slides for consideration to Troy, NY's The Art Center of the Capital Region. The website is not very comprehensive or informative but it's a good place to show. I had five pieces there in a group show a few years ago (and even got a good review!).
Speaking of Troy another place to consider is the Fulton Street Gallery - it's a really nice space and the people are super friendly and helpful. This is more of a grass-roots space, you won't get a lot of traffic, you may be expected to gallery-sit, and the housing mentioned on the website is probably crashing in somebody's living room - but I did it and don't regret it (I should confess that I have family nearby and stayed with them).
Wednesday, June 01, 2005
Photos of Recommendation: Thumbs-Up Mandala: Ray Kass
This is Ray Kass.
Ray Kass is lecturing at the University of Richmond tomorrow night, Thursday, June 2nd, at 6:15pm. I can't make it but if you go please share your thoughts.
P.S. - finding that Ray Kass image I came across another critic with good things to say about Marlene Dumas, Barry Schwabsky.
FEAST
The opening I'm sure not to miss this Friday June 3rd is that of local artist's collaborative FEAST at 1708 Gallery. The show is called FEAST... Against the World. I only know the names of two of the members, Terry Brown and Chris Norris, both of whom work independently as well. Terry is a photographer and took all of my 2003/2004 slides; Chris just showed at Flippo Gallery, ADA Gallery, and has something coming up later in the month at the Anderson Gallery. He's hot. Word is that he's maybe being "considered" for something so get your Chris Norris drawings while you can.
FEAST is hot too. They had a Jessica Dawson write-up in the Washington Post not too long ago, and I think Lenny has written about them.
See you there!
Jerry Saltz still doesn't like Marlene Dumas
None of the Artnet guys seem to like Dumas. Richard Polsky is always slamming her and in this article Charlie Finch calles her a "mediocre artist". Tyler Green smells blood so you can always count on him to give a little kick once it's safe.
Some critics do have good things to say about Dumas; Adrian Searle writes positively here, Richard Vine called her handling of paint "direct, notational, and extremely deft, as though Dumas were recording her dreams in their raw immediacy", and Nicole Davis writes "Dumas’s painterly quality is so sensuous that it furthers the hunger for her images" (scroll down to read more and see some images).
But really, who cares what the critics are paid to think, I'm interested in other artist's opinions. Commenter George had good things to say, Nicole Eisenmann seems to be a fan, Joy Garnett is interested. I'm definitely a fan.
Saltz going ga-ga over artists like Justin Faunce, Daniel Lefcourt, and Laurel Nakadate and dissing Dumas just doesn't make sense to me. Not that I think the above artists are bad, but their work can't hold a candle to Dumas' stuff. Maybe it's easier to over-praise stuff made by bright young locals who can fawn over you?
I'd like to hear what other artists have to say about Marlene Dumas. Please leave a comment.
UPDATE: Okay, it's 6:55pm Wednesday and 215 unique users have visited the blog so far today but only one has left a comment on Marlene Dumas. Give it up!
Paul Goode
Paul Goode is showing drawings at Chop Suey, not sure until when, but I know he will have stuff in the ADA 12x12 bins when this show comes down. The Chop Suey show is filled with mostly small ink drawings and the room kind of felt like a selection of possible tattoos. I think the designs are created intuitively but I got a lot of cultural references out of them like Asian dragons, South American mazes, and Native American designs. Some of them start to look like something, like the forest-floor skull I see in the piece pictured above (you really need to click on the photo to see it bigger and better). See more examples here.
Paul has a blog and often writes about Richmond arts and culture. Check it out!






























